Trees could never biologically have horses. The horse species would not be affected by the reproduction of one single tree.
This map link can give you all the answers that you want only for math you welcome
It means you're an idiot. It doesn't mean sh*t. Get over it. It means you're an idiot. It doesn't mean sh*t. Get over it.
Liquid amber trees are not poisonous to horses. However, there are many trees and plants that are toxic to horses including lemon, lime, and horseweed.
no
No, walnuts are bad for horses and can kill them if the horses eat them.
no one would know that answer because you would have to count every single one and horses could be having babies right know
Pine trees are not good for horses to eat. They may try to eat any tree if food is not present and they have not eaten in awhile. Some horses chew on trees because they are bored.
What a stupid question...those six horses would of course beat a single horse if they were of equal strength, but the single horse would beat the 6 horse chariot if it was very strong and the 6 horses were fat and ugly like you.
Yew tree leaves are lethal to horses. Other trees that are bad for horses are Oak, Maple, Cherry, Chestnut, Oleander, Walnut and Locust.
Horses can typically eat the bark of Sumac trees with no ill effects and it is not listed as being toxic. However it should be noted that if horses are allowed to strip bark off of trees it can and will kill the trees.
in trees
no.