If you are a fee owner you have the same rights as any other fee owner does in making decisions about the real estate. If you aren't a fee owner you have no right to partake in the decision making.
From paying taxes.
stopped paying taxes until they got a constitution
Yes, it did, because the groups/estates were separated, and not treated equally. The people in the lower estates were not allowed the same jobs, privileges, etc. In fact, high-paying jobs were reserved for the nobility. This led the people in the lower estates to become poor, and not able to afford basic necessities such as food.
{| |- | The decision could be based on a large number of factors. Which side was paying the better enlistment bonus? Was there a political stand in the family? Often the family would go together. Where did the rest of their family live? |}
I believe every decision, financial or otherwise, should start with the question "Why?" This will promote a thorough reflection of what brought you to this choice in the first place. Whether it's a decision about savings, spending, paying down debt, or something else, I think "Why" is much more important than the "What" or the "How."
The parents' estates are responsible for their debts. The creditors should be notified of their deaths. If there are no estates then the creditors are out of luck.
Yes, it did, because the groups/estates were separated, and not treated equally. The people in the lower estates were not allowed the same jobs, privileges, etc. In fact, high-paying jobs were reserved for the nobility. This led the people in the lower estates to become poor, and not able to afford basic necessities such as food.
Yes, it did, because the groups/estates were separated, and not treated equally. The people in the lower estates were not allowed the same jobs, privileges, etc. In fact, high-paying jobs were reserved for the nobility. This led the people in the lower estates to become poor, and not able to afford basic necessities such as food.
You have a mess on your hands. You have fraud on your hands. You might have a choice between paying the bills or charging the family member with fraud. First, you should take it up with the family member and then you should make your decision. Do you want to be out the money or do you want the family member to go to jail?
The decision to stop paying
That's up to the lender. However, asking an eighty year old grandparent to co-sign for a car loan may seem predatory and inappropriate to most people (and other family members) since the co-signer is guaranteeing the loan and will be held responsible for paying it off if the primary borrower defaults. There may well be questions of undue influence or that the co-signer was not capable of making an informed decision to take on that degree of responsibility.That's up to the lender. However, asking an eighty year old grandparent to co-sign for a car loan may seem predatory and inappropriate to most people (and other family members) since the co-signer is guaranteeing the loan and will be held responsible for paying it off if the primary borrower defaults. There may well be questions of undue influence or that the co-signer was not capable of making an informed decision to take on that degree of responsibility.That's up to the lender. However, asking an eighty year old grandparent to co-sign for a car loan may seem predatory and inappropriate to most people (and other family members) since the co-signer is guaranteeing the loan and will be held responsible for paying it off if the primary borrower defaults. There may well be questions of undue influence or that the co-signer was not capable of making an informed decision to take on that degree of responsibility.That's up to the lender. However, asking an eighty year old grandparent to co-sign for a car loan may seem predatory and inappropriate to most people (and other family members) since the co-signer is guaranteeing the loan and will be held responsible for paying it off if the primary borrower defaults. There may well be questions of undue influence or that the co-signer was not capable of making an informed decision to take on that degree of responsibility.
No.