You're only obligated to maintain that property which belongs to you.
Yes, that's the common obligation. Similarly, a landlord has to maintain a property in a habitable state and (roughly) in the condition it was in when the tenant moved in.
If that exterior object is defined as a property fixture, yes. The windows, the external plumbing, lighting, external stairs, siding, roofing, chimney, etc are all deemed fixtures and as such, a landlord has an obligation to maintain them.
Black's Law Dictionary(8th) personal obligation. 1. An obligation performable only by the obligor, not by the obligor's heirs or representatives. 2. An obligation in which the obligor is bound to perform without encumbering his or her property for its performance.
property line
I don't know Arizona laws specifically but ... I expect the law will say if the property had working air conditioning when you signed the lease and moved in, then it is the obligation of the landlord to maintain it in working condition.
You need to consult with an attorney who can review any documents that created the obligation to pay and then explain your legal options.You need to consult with an attorney who can review any documents that created the obligation to pay and then explain your legal options.You need to consult with an attorney who can review any documents that created the obligation to pay and then explain your legal options.You need to consult with an attorney who can review any documents that created the obligation to pay and then explain your legal options.
Owning property can be seen as a civic responsibility in that it often contributes to community stability and economic development. Property owners are typically invested in their neighborhoods, fostering a sense of community and civic engagement. Additionally, responsible ownership can lead to better maintenance and care of local environments, benefiting all residents. However, the obligation to own property varies based on individual circumstances and societal structures.
Yes, awnings are generally considered appurtenant structures because they are attached to the main structure of a property and provide a functional benefit to the property. They are typically included in appraisals and property valuations as part of the overall property improvement.
A mortgage encumbers the real property on which the dwelling and other structures sit. It does not matter if a garage is mentioned.A mortgage encumbers the real property on which the dwelling and other structures sit. It does not matter if a garage is mentioned.A mortgage encumbers the real property on which the dwelling and other structures sit. It does not matter if a garage is mentioned.A mortgage encumbers the real property on which the dwelling and other structures sit. It does not matter if a garage is mentioned.
It depends on the terms of the life tennancy...if she was to pay the tax and maintain the property as long as she exercised the tennancy...then she pretty much has to....if she doesn't wan the tennancy anymore, she can give it up to the remainderman, (who presumably then gets all ownership and rights to use) and he would be responsible.
If the rings belonged to you (which they did at the time) and you gave them to your husband, they are now his property. He is under no legal obligation to give them back. You would need to negotiate.If the rings belonged to you (which they did at the time) and you gave them to your husband, they are now his property. He is under no legal obligation to give them back. You would need to negotiate.If the rings belonged to you (which they did at the time) and you gave them to your husband, they are now his property. He is under no legal obligation to give them back. You would need to negotiate.If the rings belonged to you (which they did at the time) and you gave them to your husband, they are now his property. He is under no legal obligation to give them back. You would need to negotiate.
A reversionary clause provides that the grantee must fulfill some obligation or restriction or the property reverts back to the former owner. To 'satisfy' the reversionary clause you fulfill the obligation