When you are using a direct quote from literature in a paper, you leave it as it is; such as not capitalizing it if it isn't capitalized, or leaving whatever punctuation in the quote thereeven if it doesn't technically make sense.
Yes, you should capitalize the first letter of a direct quote in a paper even if it is not capitalized in the original text. This is to maintain grammatical correctness and consistency in your writing.
No it shouldn't be capitalized.
Yes, you should always capitalize the first letter of a direct quote. Do not forget to include quotation marks before and after the quote either.
You do if you are quoting the statement from the very beginning.
Yes, when referring to a specific court by name or using the full title (e.g., Supreme Court, Family Court), it is typically capitalized. However, when referring to courts in a general sense (e.g., "the court ruled"), it is not capitalized.
No, except at the beginning of a sentence because it is n ot a proper n ou n.
When the exact wording of the quote is important you welcome
No, yellow fever is referred to as "yellow fever", without any capitalizations, unless at the beginning of a sentence or quote.
Words within a sentence, after a comma or semi-colon, are not capitalized, except where the direct quote (quotation marks) is used, or for a proper name.
No. You capitalize titles and proper nouns, but you treat a quote as you would any written sentence.
You should only capitalize the first word in a quotation if you are quoting from the start of a line, or if the first word is a name. For example, if I were to quote myself, "You should only capitalize the first word in a quotation...". This is quoting from the start of a sentence, so the first word is capitalized. However, "capitalize the first word of a quotation..." does not start at the beginning of the sentence, so it doesn't need to be capitalized.
I will say avoid direct quote as much as possible; paraphrase the author instead. Good luck.
a direct quote by someone else