both
both
It is important to acknowledge and learn from incorrect predictions by analyzing all observations, including those that don't support the prediction. Changing a prediction based on new information or adjusting the underlying assumptions is a valid practice to improve future predictions. Transparently documenting the rationale behind the change helps maintain credibility and ensures a more accurate predictive model.
It is not scientifically valid to selectively ignore information that contradicts a prediction or change a prediction based on preconceived beliefs. It is important to consider all evidence, even if it goes against the initial prediction, in order to draw valid conclusions and refine future predictions. This approach is fundamental to the scientific method and ensures the integrity of the research process.
observations change
Neither. The art of precognition is not exact. If your predictions are proven correct it is unnecessary to adjust either your prediction or the observations. apex- false
The theory predicts that evolution will happen and in certain ways. The observed evolution makes this prediction correct. It also defines evolution as happening, and as such is perfect evidence in support of it.
Hypothesis is the aim of the experiment. It could be to see if there is a colour change when mixing two chemicals together. Prediction is just a guess, which could be based on evidence, data or just a wild guess. You could predict that there would be no change in colour when the two chemicals are mixed together.
observations change.
The abstract noun form for the adjective incorrect is incorrectness.
False- The hypothesis is your prediction of what you expect to happen. If the data does not agree with your hypothesis you simply explain why your hypothesis did not come true and possibly investigate variable which would allow your hypothesis to come true.
False- The hypothesis is your prediction of what you expect to happen. If the data does not agree with your hypothesis you simply explain why your hypothesis did not come true and possibly investigate variable which would allow your hypothesis to come true.
absolutely incorrect....your only security is your ability to change