Zero
This is a very important principle, which the questioner should take time to think about.
No, it is untrue. No force is required to keep a moving object moving.
Yes. No force is required to keep moving - a force is required, however, to change the velocity.
No force is required to keep something moving. According to Newton's Second Law, you need a force to speed something up, or to slow something down - not to keep it moving.
If an object is moving, no force is required to keep it moving. Forces are required to CHANGE its motion, for example, to speed it up, or to slow it down.
force and energy
No, there is not.
No, it is untrue. No force is required to keep a moving object moving.
Yes. No force is required to keep moving - a force is required, however, to change the velocity.
the same force and dahni is awesome
yes, they pass through vacuum
No force is required to keep something moving. According to Newton's Second Law, you need a force to speed something up, or to slow something down - not to keep it moving.
The best, purest answer is: Because no force at all is required to keep a moving object moving.
If the mass is already moving, then no force is required to move it any desired distance,and if it's not moving, then any force will start it moving. We'll say that there's no definiterelationship between force, mass, and distance.
If an object is moving, no force is required to keep it moving. Forces are required to CHANGE its motion, for example, to speed it up, or to slow it down.
An object has a general tendency to keep moving - that's how our Universe works. No force is required to keep an object moving - unless there is another force that slows it down. Here on Earth, there are usually frictional forces that slow objects down, and therefore a force is required to counteract the frictional forces.
depends on the mass of the train
Pitch