0
In debates leading up to the three fifths compromise, Northern states argued that?
Slaves should not be included when counting a states population to determine representation in congress. (APEX)
What else can I help you with?
What debates leading up to the three-fifths compromise southern states argued that?
Leading up to the Three-Fifths Compromise, southern states argued that enslaved individuals should be counted as part of the population for representation in Congress, despite them lacking voting rights. They contended that including enslaved people in the population count would give the South more political power and influence, helping to offset the population advantage of the northern states. Conversely, northern states opposed this notion, arguing that since enslaved individuals were not citizens and could not vote, they should not be counted for representation purposes. Ultimately, the compromise resulted in enslaved individuals being counted as three-fifths of a person for congressional representation and taxation.
In debates leading up the the Three-fifths Compromise southern states argued that?
Slaves should be counted when counting a state’s population to determine representation in congress
Who argued that because slaves were legally considered property and were not allowed to vote they should not be counted?
James Madison argued that slaves should not be counted for the purpose of representation in Congress because they were considered property and not citizens. This argument was part of the Three-Fifths Compromise during the Constitutional Convention of 1787.
Who were the 3 best speakers during the slavery debates in congress?
During the slavery debates in Congress, three of the most notable speakers were Daniel Webster, who advocated for the Union and compromise; John C. Calhoun, a staunch defender of slavery and Southern interests; and William H. Seward, who argued against the expansion of slavery and for human rights. Their speeches reflected the deep divisions in American society regarding slavery and helped shape the political landscape leading up to the Civil War. Each speaker brought a unique perspective that highlighted the complexities and moral dilemmas of the era.
Who opposed slavery on moral grounds in debates with Stephan Douglas?
Abraham Lincoln opposed slavery on moral grounds in his debates with Stephen Douglas. He argued that slavery was morally wrong and believed in the principle that all men are created equal.
What was Webster's position in the debate?
Daniel Webster was a prominent advocate for the preservation of the Union during the debates surrounding issues such as states' rights and slavery in the 19th century. He argued for compromise and sought to maintain national unity, famously supporting the Compromise of 1850, which aimed to ease sectional tensions. Webster believed that a strong federal government was essential for the nation's stability and prosperity. His speeches emphasized the importance of national identity over regional interests.
What position did Douglas take during the Lincoln-Douglas debates?
Lincoln argued that it was wrong to decide whether to allow slavery in a state or territory by voting
During the Lincoln-Douglas debates what position did Abraham Lincoln take?
Lincoln argued that it was wrong to decide whether to allow slavery in a state or territory by voting
How did the southerners manage to kill his proviso?
Southerners managed to defeat the Wilmot Proviso by using their political power to block its passage in Congress. They successfully argued that the Proviso was unconstitutional and threatened to secede from the Union if it was enacted, leading to a compromise to preserve the Union.
What position did Abraham Lincoln take on slavery during the Lincoln-Douglas debates?
Lincoln argued that it was wrong to decide whether to allow slavery in a state or territory by voting
Who led most of the Italian rennisance city- states?
The Rennisance had no real leading city-state, however Florence had many of the leading thinkers and could be argued as the leading city-state during the Italian Rennisance. The Rennisance had no real leading city-state, however Florence had many of the leading thinkers and could be argued as the leading city-state during the Italian Rennisance.
Was the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional?
The constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise was a subject of debate. Some argued that it violated the principle of states' rights, while others believed it was necessary to maintain the balance between free and slave states. Ultimately, the Compromise was overturned by the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott decision.
