Circumcision is not necessary anywhere. the original reason for circumcision is a religious/ cultural one and is in fact harmful to the person that has had it done to them. Circumcision for so called medical reasons was introduced into English speaking cultures in the mid 1800s. It was claimed by the British medics that masturbation was the cause of over a hundred different diseases ranging from syphilis to blindness and insanity and that circumcision would desensitise the penis and thereby reduce the incidence of masturbation. to make a long story short the practice persisted in the US fro the longest time and is diminishing now. However there is still a lot of sly misinformation presented to the public by a medical profession that is making a lot of money from the practice and as a result of damage done as a result. To sum up between 15 and 20% of the world men are circumcised and most of these are done for religious and cultural reasons. there is no reason why any male should be circumcised. as a mater of fact it is male genital mutilation nothing more.
Circumcision is not necessary for salvation in most Christian beliefs. Salvation is typically based on faith in Jesus Christ, not on physical rituals like circumcision.
No not at all
No.
Historically, some segments of the original Refom movement stated that circumcision wasn't necessary. Today, the Reform movement supports male circumcision.
Less then 2%
It can be done on the NHS free if necessary.
Circumcision is reputed to cause a number of problems regarding infection, however it is very difficult to pin the practitioners down especially in the USA where the practice of necessary circumcision is rife,
Circumcision is not necessary for all individuals because it is not medically required for good health. It is a personal and cultural choice that some people make for various reasons, but it is not essential for everyone.
The United States has the highest circumcision rate. In America, 90 percent of males are circumcised.
No .normally circumcision is the removal of healthy tissue from the penis and as such is not a necessary procedure, on the contrary it is harmful. However if it is a medical necessity then chances are it would be covered.
Normally no. It will not pay for infant circumcision as that is not a necessary medical procedure. It will not pay for any circumcision done for cosmetic reasons. However, Medicaid will cover circumcision when it is medically necessary, for example when an adult male has phimosis, a chronic constriction of the foreskin that prevents normal functioning of the penis.
the only reason they say it is necessary is for sanitary purpose. Other then that there is no "medical" advantage to having a circumcision.