0
In Brown v. Board of Education what does Mr Davis mean when he says South Carolina does not come to court in sack cloth and ashes?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
The term "sack cloth and ashes" is an idiomatic reference to garments indicating penitence or humility in the Hebrew faith, and he is saying that the state does not apologize for its stand on segregation, or in fact think that they are wronging the black students.
Here, the state could scarcely disguise the difference between the schools provided for whites as opposed to blacks, but claimed that it was not the intent of the laws.
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the name of the South Carolina companion case to Brown v Board of Education concerning children in Clarendon County?
The South Carolina case consolidated with Brown v. Board of Education, 347 US 483 (1954) was Briggs v. Elliot. Briggs v. Elliot, 342 US 350 (1952) originally came before the court in 1952, but the decision was vacated and the case remanded back to US District Court for disposition.The four cases consolidated under Browninclude:Brown v. Board of Education, 347 US 483 (1954) (Kansas)Briggs v. Elliot (South Carolina)*Davis v. County Board of Education of Prince Edward County (Virginia)Gebhart v. Belton (Delaware)Companion case, heard separately:Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 US 497 (1954) (District of Columbia)
Who were the lead attorneys for both sides in Brown v. Board of Education?
Thurgood Marshall served as the lead attorney for the plaintiffs in Brown v. Board of Education. He was the director-counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund at the time. On the opposing side, John W. Davis was one of the lead attorneys representing the Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas.
Who was the Assistant Attorney General of Kansas who argued in favor of segregation before the US Supreme Court in Brown v Board of Education?
The Assistant Attorney General of Kansas who argued in favor of segregation before the US Supreme Court in Brown v Board of Education was Paul E. Wilson. He defended the "separate but equal" doctrine that upheld racial segregation in public schools. The Supreme Court later rejected this argument and ruled in favor of desegregation.
How was Attorney John W Davis' reference to Aesop's fable supposed to affect the court in Brown v. Board of Education?
Attorney John W. Davis referenced Aesop's fable "The Tortoise and the Hare" to suggest that social progress should be gradual, rather than rushed. He was arguing against the immediate desegregation sought by the plaintiffs in Brown v. Board of Education, urging the court to consider the potential consequences of rapid change on society.
What man whose name is a color sued the board of education?
Brown v. Board of Education, 347 US 483 (1954)Oliver Brown was the nominal (named) petitioner in Brown v. Board of Education, (1954); however, Brownwas a class action suit against segregation brought on behalf of thirteen plaintiffs and their children in the Topeka, Kansas, school district. The other plaintiffs in the case were Darlene Brown (no relation), Lena Carper, Sadie Emmanuel, Marguerite Emerson, Shirley Fleming, Zelma Henderson, Shirley Hodison, Maude Lawton, Alma Lewis, Iona Richardson, and Lucinda Todd.Contrary to popular belief, Oliver Brown did not initiate the suit against the Board of Education; the NAACP did. The civil rights organization then recruited African-American families who were willing to join the case.At the Supreme Court level, Brown v. Board of Education was consolidated (put together with) with three other cases that were collectively referred to as Brown: Briggs v. Elliott(South Carolina); Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County (Virginia); and Gebhart v. Belton (Delaware). The NAACP also brought a companion case heard the same day, Bolling v. Sharpe, that had to be considered separately because it concerned a school in Washington, DC, which operates under federal, not state, laws.For more information, see Related Questions, below.
What was the US Supreme Court decision in Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education?
Aurelia Davis sued the Monroe County Board of Education, on behalf of her 5th-grade daughter, LaShonda. The suit alleged that the Monroe County Board of Education failed to prevent LaShonda's suffering sexual harassment at the hands of another student. The school's complacency created an abusive environment that deprived her daughter of educational benefits promised her under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Ms. Davis, with a vote of 5 to 4.
What has the author Junius A Davis written?
Junius A. Davis has written: 'Black students in predominantly white North Carolina colleges and universities' -- subject(s): African Americans, Education (Higher)
Who is the leader of Virginia's NAACP defense in the companion case to Brown v Board of Education?
Virginia NAACP DefenseSpottswood W. Robinson III was the leader of Virginia's NAACP defense in the Virginia case, Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County, which was one of five cases consolidated as Brown v. Board of Education, (1954).A companion case, Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497 (1954), was heard separately because it originated in Washington, DC, which is federal, not state, territory. This case had to be considered in terms of specific federal statutes.
What is Thomas Davis's number on the Carolina Panthers?
Josh Thomas is number 22 on the Carolina Panthers.
When did Alice Brown Davis die?
Alice Brown Davis died in 1935.
What nicknames does Zachary Davis Brown go by?
Zachary Davis Brown goes by Zack.
Who is number 48 Davis from north Carolina Panthers?
Steven Davis
