You did not provide enough information to answer this question adequately. You can check the Illinois Revised Code or Statue Code which can be found on line.
Most States in the United States of America recognize that within a marriage, each person (mother and father) possess exactly the same "custody" rights as one another. Most states presume and acknowledge that a child born IN wedlock is the child of the married persons. So, legally speaking, if you are married, you and your husband have the same rights to custody until a court of competent jurisdiction decides otherwise. Married mothers do not possess "sole custody" of their children simply based on the fact she gave birth to them.
On the other hand, most States in the United State of America, concerning unmarried Women, recognize and adhere to the fact that children born OUT of wedlock remain in the sole physical custody of the child's mother until a court of competent jurisdiction rules otherwise.
So, in summary, if you're married, you don't have sole custody...it is up to a judge.
If you're unmarried, you do have sole custody unless/until a judge rules otherwise.
Hope this helps. This is a very important issue...
it depends on your custody papers and what they say... if you have joint custody NO.... if you have residential custody maybe with court allowing it.... if you have sole custody then you would need to inform him but you could leave!!!
Yes, they have an assumption of sole custody in every state except Arizona.
It really depends. I think that the mother and father should have full custody. I say this because the mother is doing this to get better, for the benefit of her kids. Some might argue that she should not have custody because why would she had to go to rehab in the first place. It really depends. I think that the mother and father should have full custody. I say this because the mother is doing this to get better, for the benefit of her kids. Some might argue that she should not have custody because why would she had to go to rehab in the first place.
1839 An 'innocent' mother could have custody of her children until they were seven years old. In 1873 Mothers could have custody over there children until they were sixteen, only if the mother was innocent.
If mother has custody, then she has all the say until the girl turns 18. If she objects, then the girl must obey.
Once a child is in state custody I don't think the mother has a say in who adopts the child. However, you may be allowed to meet the adoptive parents.
Without knowing the jurisdiction difficult to say. In general, you'd need to prove the mother is unfit to have custody. This is a hard thing to do. Joint custody is more likely.
Just to say that someone is a alcoholic is very vague. You need proof to present in court that he is and that he is neglecting the child.
I don't believe the mother can do that in any state. There is an order of how things are supposed to go. The mother must ask the courts permission to go and it must be granted. Fathers do have rights.
Yes, but I teach fathers how to change that.
Yes. The child is your baby. As long as your a fit mother the child cannot be taken away from you. If you are a minor, your parents still have custody of you, but you have custody of your child.
Your ex-wife has Parental Responsibility (PR) for her children irrespective of your "sole custody". PR are all the rights, duties and obligations of a parent, including a right to have a say in the important dsecisions in the childrens lives. In the exercise of that PR she can seek information for the children's doctor/school etc