they might get higher paying jobs elsewhere
the marginal products of sucessive workers can be sold at a constant price
A monopsonist hires fewer workers than a firm in a competitive labor market because it is the sole buyer of labor, giving it greater market power to set wages. Unlike competitive firms that accept the market wage, a monopsonist must raise wages to attract additional workers, leading to higher marginal costs for hiring. As a result, the monopsonist will hire workers up to the point where the marginal cost of labor equals the marginal revenue product, which typically occurs at a lower quantity of employment compared to competitive firms. This results in a lower overall employment level in the monopsonistic market.
Trade embargos and corruption are factors that could prevent a given market from becoming competitive. These factors usually lead to uneven playing ground as far as the competitiveness of a given market is concerned.
In a competitive market, the price does equal the marginal revenue.
There is no such thing as a perfectly competitive market. It is merely a economic model to compare other market structures to. Cigarette market is more likely a oligopoly.
Generate a debate about competitive market? How in your opinion a Competitive market can be evolved?
In a perfectly competitive market, marginal revenue is equal to price.
In a perfectly competitive market, the price is equal to the marginal revenue.
A competitive market is one that has multiple buyers and sellers. This means there is no single vendor or consumer who has absolute control over the price in the market. In such a market, businesses openly compete for market share.
By Market Force
Yes, in a perfectly competitive market, marginal revenue equals price.
According to statistics, in 2010, Pepsi had 11.5% of the global soft drink market.