In a scientific investigation, after the question is defined, the next step is typically to conduct background research. This involves reviewing existing literature and studies related to the question to gather relevant information and context. Following this, researchers formulate a hypothesis, which is a testable prediction that addresses the defined question. This sets the stage for designing experiments or observations to test the hypothesis.
Repeatable data
If a person about the world ,he or she is likely to begin asking questions about it. Posing question is usually the first step in the process of scientific inquiry.
Repetition is copying an investigation, while replication of an investigation is the results of an investigation, which is not likely to be accepted unless the investigation is repeated multiple times and the same result is obtained.
To determine which hypothesis is most likely to be productive for an initial investigation, one should focus on a hypothesis that is specific, measurable, and directly related to the research question. A well-defined hypothesis that addresses a clear relationship or effect is more likely to yield meaningful results. Additionally, it should be grounded in existing literature to ensure relevance and feasibility. Finally, considering the availability of data and resources can further enhance the productivity of the investigation.
thermometer
scientific actuality
Repeatable data
If a person about the world ,he or she is likely to begin asking questions about it. Posing question is usually the first step in the process of scientific inquiry.
Repetition is copying an investigation, while replication of an investigation is the results of an investigation, which is not likely to be accepted unless the investigation is repeated multiple times and the same result is obtained.
Repetition is copying an investigation, while replication of an investigation is the results of an investigation, which is not likely to be accepted unless the investigation is repeated multiple times and the same result is obtained.
To determine which hypothesis is most likely to be productive for an initial investigation, one should focus on a hypothesis that is specific, measurable, and directly related to the research question. A well-defined hypothesis that addresses a clear relationship or effect is more likely to yield meaningful results. Additionally, it should be grounded in existing literature to ensure relevance and feasibility. Finally, considering the availability of data and resources can further enhance the productivity of the investigation.
The next step after asking a scientific question is to do a research of existing literature to see what other scientists may know about that particular question, which perhaps has already been answered by someone other than yourself. If not, then you can attempt to make an observation of nature, or an experiment, which will help you to answer that question.
Scientists are most likely to change a scientific theory if new evidence contradicts the existing theory, if the theory fails to explain new observations accurately, or if a more comprehensive theory emerges that better explains the phenomena in question. Scientific theories are constantly refined and updated based on rigorous testing and evidence.
detective story
thermometer
An investigation which is conducted under strictly controlled and monitored conditions is likely to result in mor reliable investigations.
most likely