Want this question answered?
The type of person/people who could become consul in ancient Rome were those who were wealthy and willing to risk their wealth to be elected to the various offices leading up to consul.The type of person/people who could become consul in ancient Rome were those who were wealthy and willing to risk their wealth to be elected to the various offices leading up to consul.The type of person/people who could become consul in ancient Rome were those who were wealthy and willing to risk their wealth to be elected to the various offices leading up to consul.The type of person/people who could become consul in ancient Rome were those who were wealthy and willing to risk their wealth to be elected to the various offices leading up to consul.The type of person/people who could become consul in ancient Rome were those who were wealthy and willing to risk their wealth to be elected to the various offices leading up to consul.The type of person/people who could become consul in ancient Rome were those who were wealthy and willing to risk their wealth to be elected to the various offices leading up to consul.The type of person/people who could become consul in ancient Rome were those who were wealthy and willing to risk their wealth to be elected to the various offices leading up to consul.The type of person/people who could become consul in ancient Rome were those who were wealthy and willing to risk their wealth to be elected to the various offices leading up to consul.The type of person/people who could become consul in ancient Rome were those who were wealthy and willing to risk their wealth to be elected to the various offices leading up to consul.
the PATRICIANS. the poor, common people were the PLEBIANS.
biscuits or pancakes in honey
Money. The wealthy had the financial means to live a more lavish lifestyle than the poor. In addition, if a person were wealthy enough, he could try to enter politics, in particular if he were of the patrician or plebeian class.
The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.
Wealthy
A business man in ancient Rome was a "negotiator". As a class, many of the business men were wealthy enough to be Equites.A business man in ancient Rome was a "negotiator". As a class, many of the business men were wealthy enough to be Equites.A business man in ancient Rome was a "negotiator". As a class, many of the business men were wealthy enough to be Equites.A business man in ancient Rome was a "negotiator". As a class, many of the business men were wealthy enough to be Equites.A business man in ancient Rome was a "negotiator". As a class, many of the business men were wealthy enough to be Equites.A business man in ancient Rome was a "negotiator". As a class, many of the business men were wealthy enough to be Equites.A business man in ancient Rome was a "negotiator". As a class, many of the business men were wealthy enough to be Equites.A business man in ancient Rome was a "negotiator". As a class, many of the business men were wealthy enough to be Equites.A business man in ancient Rome was a "negotiator". As a class, many of the business men were wealthy enough to be Equites.
Yes,ancient Rome was very wealthy.Its treasures are the proof.
The type of person/people who could become consul in ancient Rome were those who were wealthy and willing to risk their wealth to be elected to the various offices leading up to consul.The type of person/people who could become consul in ancient Rome were those who were wealthy and willing to risk their wealth to be elected to the various offices leading up to consul.The type of person/people who could become consul in ancient Rome were those who were wealthy and willing to risk their wealth to be elected to the various offices leading up to consul.The type of person/people who could become consul in ancient Rome were those who were wealthy and willing to risk their wealth to be elected to the various offices leading up to consul.The type of person/people who could become consul in ancient Rome were those who were wealthy and willing to risk their wealth to be elected to the various offices leading up to consul.The type of person/people who could become consul in ancient Rome were those who were wealthy and willing to risk their wealth to be elected to the various offices leading up to consul.The type of person/people who could become consul in ancient Rome were those who were wealthy and willing to risk their wealth to be elected to the various offices leading up to consul.The type of person/people who could become consul in ancient Rome were those who were wealthy and willing to risk their wealth to be elected to the various offices leading up to consul.The type of person/people who could become consul in ancient Rome were those who were wealthy and willing to risk their wealth to be elected to the various offices leading up to consul.
the PATRICIANS. the poor, common people were the PLEBIANS.
the number of weapons you have
biscuits or pancakes in honey
Wealthy Eygptians preserved bodies as mummies
Wealthy people of Rome were called Patricians. American Government class? Me too. Tcarver6
Wealthy people
Plebeians: The underclass of Roman society.Patricians: The wealthy and powerful in Rome.
Money. The wealthy had the financial means to live a more lavish lifestyle than the poor. In addition, if a person were wealthy enough, he could try to enter politics, in particular if he were of the patrician or plebeian class.