answersLogoWhite

0

In favor for Criminals are wicked and deserve punishment?

Updated: 8/17/2019
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Best Answer

criminals are wicked in my views

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: In favor for Criminals are wicked and deserve punishment?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What is a repreive?

Being saved from due circumstances/punishment. A good example is Grace, or unmerited favor - something we don't deserve - God's forgiveness through His Son, Jesus if we confess and repent of our wicked ways.


Do criminals vote democrat or republican and what is their voting rate?

The majority of criminals do not vote, but the ones that do are more likely to vote Democrat because of their policies that coddle criminal behavior. Republicans are more likely to favor policies that focus on the punishment of criminals like the death penalty and harsher sentences. Democrats tend to favor policies such as granting felons the right to vote, and social programs that invest resources in the "rehabilitation" of criminals. People vote out of self-interest. Criminals are no different.


Can you give me a sentence using the word deserve?

I actually want to deserve a raise. I am not certain that your question will deserve an answer. Every good boy will deserve favor.


Q debate on criminals are wicked and deserve punishment favor in motion?

Criminals should be cured and not punished...Criminals are also humans, so why to treat them as wild beats and monsters.If they murder, kidnap, rob or do any sexual abuse, they may either be mentally sick or do think in spite of their circumstance or problems like lac of money etc. Perhaps they guardians or parents do not have given them proper education or they are from this type or kind of background. They might be in need of something or the other. but without any sort of information the criminals are given very bad punishment which do not fit them.They are kept in hell and watched around the clock that turn the criminals in wild beasts and when done a small mistake and they escape, they cause damage to the public.So what I actually want to say is that they need to be cured and not punished.Let me put an example to make the discussion more easy to understand, suppose a man has murdered 7 people out of which he raped 3 girls. Cops caught him and he hes going to be sentenced to death tomorrow. My question is that if we kill him will the people he murdered, will they be back? No, right? might be he is mentally sick and needs a cure. So why not cure him in place of killing him. He might be some one's son or father, right? So why not cure him in place of granting him a punishment which can destroy his whole family?So I would like to conclude saying that, if he can cure then why can't we give him a chance, and if he repeats we can punish him.


Capital punishment has no place in a society claiming to be civilised?

That's a debatable point; there has to be some way for a civilized society to protect itself from people who refuse to be civil. Murder and rape are the ultimate acts of incivility, and deserve the ultimate punishment. Other societies in earlier ages have used banishment as the "ultimate penalty", but the world today is too crowded for us to throw our wrongdoers into someone elses' society, for them to clean up our messes. In America, the debate is between those who favor capital punishment and those who favor "life without parole" sentences for violent and dangerous criminals. The ultimate flaw with the concept of "life without parole" is that criminals escape, or are accidentally released, and that violent and dangerous people will be freed to once again commit unspeakable crimes. And finally, many lawyers who oppose executing violent criminals are perfectly willing to admit that "life without parole" sentences are simply the first step in the chain toward eliminating "life" prison terms entirely.


Which practice did Progressives favor?

The right to recall officials from office


Which son's offering did God favor?

What was Cain to become as punishment


Was there capital punishment in France in 1775?

Capital punishment (executing someone) existed in France from it's beginnings, until a few years ago, when it was abolished in favor of life imprisonment without parole.


Mandatory minimum sentences and guideline sentences are currently in favor due to a general public sentiment that favors rehabilitation as a form of punishment. Is this true?

Exactly the contrary. The public is fed up with judges being able to tailor what they believe to be 'lenient' sentences for criminals, and the legislatures have reacted by passing statutes which take this option out of the hands of judges and REQUIRE stated amounts of jail time for certain offenses.


What is a sentence with the word alibi in it?

Alibi is the Latin word for elsewhere.


What was the favor Midas did for Dionysus?

King Midas found Dionysus's friend, Silenus, was asleep in the flower gardens. Midas let him go without punishment.


If a jury decideds a case in favor of plaintiff can a judge grant a motion that effectively means that the defendant wins?

No, a judge cannot reverse a jury finding. However the judge does determine the fine, so if the judge deems someone not responsible for the maximum punishment he can receive an extremely light punishment.