Knights were the lowest rung of nobility during the middle ages. They were essentially soldiers for hire, and most of them were thieves, murderers, rapists, and worse; though if they were victorious in battle, they were awarded lands, and even titles. Tournaments were not the polite, colorful jousts we imagine, but were often brutal, wholesale slaughters. The version of the chivalrous knight we have today comes from the writings of Thomas Malory; his Le Morte D'Arthur, which was written while Malory, a knight himself, was imprisoned for several of the crimes enumerated above. This romanticized version is mainly fiction.
Battles like Agincourt proved that knights were not best troop you can have on battlefield, knights were often impetuous and this was not always an advantage, a standing army defending a strategic position proved to be much more effective than a cavalry charge, much more strategys to defeat heavy cavalry of knights were developed and knights were always less effective, another reasons are the expenditure on knights wages, maintenance, rewards..etc
Women could become knights. Please use the link to the related question below for more information.
There was more rights for women
Knights used to be famous because in their time they were guards, warriours, fighters, and protectors. The reason they were more famous was because they had alot of movies made about them to but that isn't the main reason the main reason is. Back then Knights were noble warriors and everybodu could trust them. Noble warriours of the king!
Young Noble boys who showed promise started knight training around 7 or 8 years old. As they approached their teens they were made Squires to a knight. Some stayed and others would leave the "program". A young man became at knight at 21. An interesting bit of trivia about knights is that they were not allowed by law to wear rings. Many of the early knights were little more than thugs for the local Nobility and were more like the mafia than the shiny knight in armour that we think of from stories. It wasn't until the Church stepped in and made the knights vow before relics of Saints that they would no long harm or kill widows, children or the elderly that some order was brought to the knighthood.
it needs more detail I asked for 1900 in Britain . Not New York .
Hell lol maybe putting more detail in your question will get you a better answer dumb as*
more detail please.
There was a great attention to detail in the painting.I'd like some more detail on the skirt, please.
Please follow the links for more detail
Knights. Froissart was more focused on battles, chivalry, and nobility.
Does anyone really care? Leave them be. You wouldn't like it if someone wanted to know every detail of your life.
There was a great attention to detail in the painting.I'd like some more detail on the skirt, please.
That depends on what Knights you are talking about. Are you talking about the medieval Knights in each Kingdom, the Knights of Malta, the Knights Templar? You are going to have to be a little more specific to get a meaningful answer.
Battles like Agincourt proved that knights were not best troop you can have on battlefield, knights were often impetuous and this was not always an advantage, a standing army defending a strategic position proved to be much more effective than a cavalry charge, much more strategys to defeat heavy cavalry of knights were developed and knights were always less effective, another reasons are the expenditure on knights wages, maintenance, rewards..etc
Gives more detail
It filters!!! Asker: Please give more detail.