0
In the 1830s and 40s explain how both the North and the South took part in the institution of slavery?
First, understand that some Northern States (Maryland) were slave states. Businesses in the North transported slaves to the US, and sold them in the South (slave ships). Businesses in the North invested in the South, including companies that used slaves (coal mining, building railroads) and Northern businesses wanted goods grown in the South by slaves- cotton and tobacco.
What else can I help you with?
What social institution did Europeans in the Caribbean share with their counterparts in North America?
Slavery
State that did not allow state?
States in the north did not allow slavery until the 1830s. It was also illegal to bring slaves to the west and midwest.
Explain why slavery develed in the south and not in the north?
Slavery was more rampant in the south and not in the north because opposition to the practice was much higher.
Why did some people in the North support the institution of slavery?
Northerners did not want the slaves to worry about unemployment like factory workers from the North.
Was Missouri a slave state or a free state in the 1830s?
A slave state. Its Southern border was taken as the line, North of which slavery would henceforth be illegal.
What did the slavery issue have on the democratic and Whig parties?
The issue of slavery split the party. "Conscience Whigs" in the North favored the abolition of slavery and halting the institution's spread into new territories. The "Cotton Whigs" in the South took the opposite viewpoints
What was the impact of Uncle Tom's Cabin in the north?
"Uncle Tom's Cabin" fueled anti-slavery sentiments in the North by exposing the harsh realities of slavery to a wider audience. It increased support for the abolitionist cause and helped shape public opinion against the institution of slavery. The novel's impact added momentum to the growing abolitionist movement in the North.
What after The Missouri Compromise most Americans in the 1830s and 1840s agreed that slavery?
After the Missouri Compromise of 1820, most Americans in the 1830s and 1840s agreed that slavery was a contentious issue that needed to be addressed, but opinions were deeply divided along regional lines. Many in the South supported the institution of slavery, viewing it as essential to their agricultural economy, while many in the North began to increasingly oppose it on moral and political grounds. The compromise had temporarily settled the balance between free and slave states, but it also highlighted the growing sectional tensions that would eventually lead to the Civil War. Thus, while there was a general acknowledgment of the issue, consensus on its future remained elusive.
Did Hugh Williamson have anything to do with slavery?
Hugh Williamson was a signer of the United States Constitution and a prominent North Carolina delegate to the Constitutional Convention in 1787. There is no direct evidence to suggest that he was involved in slavery. However, as a plantation owner in North Carolina, it is likely that he may have benefited from the institution of slavery in his personal life.
What impact did the slavery issue have on the democratic and whig parties?
The issue of slavery split the party. "Conscience Whigs" in the North favored the abolition of slavery and halting the institution's spread into new territories. The "Cotton Whigs" in the South took the opposite viewpoints
W hitch or the following reasons best explain why southern slaves suffered more after the north began abolishing slavery?
In order to know which of the following reasons best explain why southern slaves suffered more after the north began abolishing slavery one needs to know the choices for answers.
Did the north want slavery?
No. North wanted to end slavery and south wanted slavery
