Maybe you mean "intent" rather than "motive." Some torts require an intentional act such as assault or battery. The tort of negligence can be committed without intent, but it is based on being careless.
Questioner needs to define what they mean by "coercion" -BUT- as a GENERAL rule, yes, coercion is usually considered unlawful conduct.
General intent does not require an intentional unlawful action but only that a wrongful act was commtitted. Specific intent requires intentional unlawful action
Penal Code 12020(a) of California addresses the unlawful possession of specific weapons and generally requires specific intent. This means that the prosecution must prove that the defendant intentionally possessed the prohibited weapon with knowledge of its nature. Unlike general intent crimes, which only require the intent to perform the act, specific intent crimes necessitate a higher level of culpability regarding the defendant's knowledge and purpose.
No, the general staff position does not conduct tactical operations. The Operations Section Chief is responsible for the tactical operations.
In general, a plaintiff in a negligence claim must prove the following elements: duty of care owed by the defendant to the plaintiff, breach of that duty by the defendant, causation (both actual and proximate) between the defendant's breach and the plaintiff's injury, and damages suffered by the plaintiff as a result of the defendant's breach.
The definition of unlawful objects depends on where you are, and what the laws are. If you don't have a concealed weapon license, then even standing out in a field in the middle of nowhere, a gun in your pocket would still be unlawful. However, even if you do have a license, having that same gun close to a school or an airport would be unlawful. Right now, a tube of toothpaste in your carry-on bag is an unlawful object at an airport. Hopefully, toothpaste is pretty benign other places. In general, an unlawful object is anything that there are laws against... and in many places, the law supports whatever the local rules are.
Solids can definitely conduct electricity -- like copper wires. It is a general property of metals.
no they do not conduct because they are neutral things
The word "defendant" is typically capitalized when it appears at the beginning of a sentence or in legal documents, such as court filings or legal briefs. In general writing, it is not required to capitalize "defendant" unless it is part of a formal title or heading.
It isn't. In law, the plaintiff makes a complaint that he has been wronged by the defendant. The defendant must defend himself against the plaintiff's action. In some places, the accused person in a criminal case is also called a defendant; here again, the accusation has been brought against him and he must defend against it, if only by making the general denial implied by a plea of not guilty.
This depends on the jurisdiction. In general it is going to be an unlawful physical contact. It doesn't even have to cause damage or injury.
You don't. It is unlawful to fish with live bait in the provence of Alberta. http://www.albertaregulations.ca/fishingregs/general-regs.html