answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The body

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

1w ago

You should discuss your main points and the evidence that supports them in the body of your speech, typically after the introduction. This is where you provide detailed explanations, examples, and data to strengthen your arguments and persuade your audience.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: In what part of your speech should you discuss your main points and the evidence which supports them?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What part of your speech should you discuss your main points and the evidence which supports them?

The body


How many points should a writer discuss in a paragraph?

1


What question should a writer ask when choosing evidence to support a claim?

Is the evidence from the best source I can find


What should you do if you you find evidence that supports opposing conclusions based on your research question?

If you find evidence that supports opposing conclusions based on your research question, weigh the evidence for both conclusions and pick the one you think is most convincing.


What should you do if you find evidence that supports opposing conclusions based on your research question?

If you find evidence that supports opposing conclusions based on your research question, weigh the evidence for both conclusions and pick the one you think is most convincing.


When writing a character analysis about death of a salesman what should you do after finding textual evidence to support your claim?

explain how your evidence supports your claim


When building an outline how should a writer categorize each piece of evidence?

According to the claim it supports


When writing a character analysis essay about Death of a Salesman what should you do after finding textual evidence to support your claim?

explain how your evidence supports your claim


When evaluating someone else's ethical judgment what should you focus on?

Focus on whether the judgment is reasonable and evidence supports it.


What should you do if in the process of gathering information about a research question you find evidence that supports two opposing conclusions?

Weigh the evidence for both conclusions and decide which has the most merit


'the rules of evidence merely place unnecessary restrictions on the evidence which can be heard by jury and should be replaced with a system of free proof'.discuss with reference to laws in england.?

simply


What should scientists do if new evidence was found which didnt relate the big bang theory?

They would find what theory this evidence supports instead (according to AQA exam mark sheet)