Although both of these killers had a different MO (modus operandi) they loved to taunt the police and derived much pleasure thinking they were smarter than the authorities.
Jack the Ripper was never caught so there is no way to know who he was or who he was related to.
Jack The Ripper was never caught so there is no way to know if he was ever in prison.
Since Jack The Ripper was never caught there is no way to discern his eye color. Short of a positive ID, we can only guess what the Ripper looked like.
That is unknown because it is not known for sure who Jack the Ripper was. The question of his profile is still asked today.
Jack the Ripper was never caught and identified so there is no way to know the identity of his comrades. From the crime scenes and nature of the murders it is very unlikely that the Ripper had any help. The majority of serial killers work alone, the Ripper was almost certainly alone in his crimes.
Since Jack The Ripper was never caught we have no way of knowing if he was 'Gothic' or not. But the term gothic is a modern trend, unheard of until the late 20th century, I doubt that JTR was.
police was not as affective as they are now and there was no way of finding pepoles DNA
Jack the Ripper was an Englishman in 1800's London. Social Security was created in the United States in the 1930's. They are not related in any way or by any means. So, the answer to your question is it didn't.
There is no historical evidence to suggest that Jack the Ripper wore a cloak. The portrayal of Jack the Ripper wearing a cloak has been perpetuated by fictionalized depictions in movies and literature. The actual identity of Jack the Ripper remains unknown.
It can be. Jack from Jack and the Beanstalk was either a scoundrel or a hero, depending on the version of the story. Jack the Ripper is quite famous, but not that cool... scary, murderous, you know... Jack-Jack from the Incredibles is *way* cool...
Jack The Ripper. No, Jack the Ripper is just the most notorious. There are far too many murders and murderers to know who may be the nastiest. And after years of research on the subject (if you can stomach it) you would only arrive at an opinion. Nasty can mean a lot of things and there are way more nastier and way more prolific murderers than Jack.
Jack the Ripper brought attention to the deplorable conditions of the east end of London. In that way he may have precipitated much needed change for the poor. But that is the extent of his civic contributions.