A city council's proposal recordsA petition and letter to your congressional representative
A city council's proposal records Apex :0 Apple University pride ~w~
one is documents facts the other is a thought on what might be
Well, that depends on what kind of documents they are. If they are documents that someone else might need, or documents that prove your guilt in a case in court, then no, it is not legal to do so.
Hidden doors in walls may reveal secret passageways, hidden rooms, valuable treasures, confidential documents, or evidence of past events.
Depending on the context, synonyms might include bluster, braggadocio, pomposity, or rhetoric.
Crime scene evidence can be analyzed in forensic laboratories, which are specialized facilities equipped with tools and techniques to examine and process a wide range of evidence such as DNA, fingerprints, trace evidence, and documents from crime scenes. These laboratories are staffed with forensic scientists who are trained to analyze evidence and provide expert testimony in court.
The evidence might be unreliable because technology and other knowledge has advanced since that time, and their evidence might have been biased.
To lay a solid foundation for evidence in a case, one can ask questions such as: What specific events or actions occurred? Who was present or involved? When and where did the events take place? Are there any documents or physical evidence related to the case? Can witnesses provide testimony to support the claims? What motives or intentions might be relevant to the case? Are there any inconsistencies or gaps in the evidence that need to be addressed?
Immigration lawyers don't ususaly go to court all that much. Mostly they specialize in the paperwork involved with applying for citizanship, and dealing with the INS. They might need to provide some evidence, such as birth documents from the clients country of origion, and character witnesses from friends and family for various reasons, however. What "types of evidence" an attorney might present depends on whether he is representing the defendant or the plaintiff. It also depends very much on what the case is about. Immigration attorneys appear in court for many, many reasons.
Proving something without evidence typically relies on logical reasoning, assumptions, or personal conviction rather than empirical data. For example, one might use deductive reasoning to draw conclusions based on established principles or axioms. Additionally, beliefs or claims can be supported through rhetoric or appeals to authority, though these methods do not constitute proof in a scientific or empirical sense. Ultimately, without evidence, claims remain unverified and open to skepticism.
You would need to provide evidence that the court can review that highlights and counters the alleged bias. You need to show the reasons why the court should conclude that the lawyer is biased. For example, the evidence might be in written form such as official documents, testimony of witnesses or evaluations and affidavits made by professionals.
Direct evidence are visible noticable changes. Indirect evidence is when you might not see the action happen but you do notice the results