0
Inductive thinking begins with what and goes on to draw conclusions?
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
specific, facts, and evidence
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What type of thinking occurse when you make desissions and draw conclusions?
specifics, facts, and evidence
What should an experimenter do after analyzing data?
scientist analyes their experiment
How do you draw a conclusion?
We draw conclusions by reading and understanding the passage first, and then you kind of summarise after doing it.
When analyzing literature you draw conclusions based on?
evidence from the text
What can scientists do if the results of an experiment do not support a hypothesis?
draw conclusions
Begins with specifics facts and evidence and goes on to draw conclusions?
Inductive thinking
How deductive and inductive reasoning are the same?
Deductive and inductive reasoning are both methods of logical thinking used to draw conclusions. They both involve making observations, forming hypotheses, and reaching conclusions based on evidence. However, deductive reasoning moves from general principles to specific conclusions, while inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to general conclusions.
What are 3 types of decision making?
deductive - which allows one to draw conclusions inductive - which allows one to expand on conclusions and logical - which draws on your own experiences
What 3 types of decision making?
deductive - which allows one to draw conclusions inductive - which allows one to expand on conclusions and logical - which draws on your own experiences
What Greek philosopher invented inductive reasoning?
Aristotle is credited with introducing inductive reasoning in his works on logic and philosophy. He used this method to observe specific instances and draw general conclusions from them.
What type of thinking occurse when you make desissions and draw conclusions?
specifics, facts, and evidence
Why is it so important for you to draw conclusions about things you read?
Drawing conclusions makes you think. If you're not thinking while you read, you are wasting your time.
What should inductive arguments never be characterized as?
Inductive arguments should never be characterized as guaranteeing truth or absolute certainty. This is because inductive reasoning relies on specific examples to draw general conclusions, which are probabilistic and open to revision based on new evidence.
Inductive reasoning is the use of?
specific ideas to argue for a general idea.
What is the definition of inductive method?
Inductive method is a research technique where specific observations are used to draw general conclusions or theories. It involves gathering and analyzing data to identify patterns or relationships that can lead to the development of theories or hypotheses. The goal is to derive broad generalizations from specific observations.
Inductive reasoning is empirical in nature?
Inductive reasoning involves making generalizations based on specific observations or data. It is empirical in nature because it relies on evidence collected through observation or experiment to draw conclusions about broader patterns or trends.
Inductive and deductive?
Inductive reasoning involves drawing general conclusions from specific observations or examples, while deductive reasoning involves starting with general premises and using them to reach specific conclusions. Inductive reasoning is more probabilistic and involves making educated guesses, while deductive reasoning is more logical and deterministic. Both types of reasoning are used to draw conclusions and make decisions in various fields such as science, mathematics, and philosophy.
