James Henry Thornwell was a Presbyterian preacher and religious writer born in South Carolina in 1812. He became prominent in the South and had a prominent role in establishing the Southern Presbyterian Church. He didn't condemn slavery outright or any other way because he was an advocate of slavery. In 1850 he characterized the Abolitionists in the conflict over slavery as atheists, socialists, communists, red republicans, Jacobins and characterized supporters of slavery as friends of order and regulated freedom.
He should be contrasted to Albert Barnes at the related question link.
James Henley Thornwell preached that slavery was a necessary social institution ordained by God. He argued that it was beneficial for both the slaves, as it provided them with protection and guidance, and for the white masters, as it allowed them to fulfill their God-given duties as rulers and guardians. Thornwell believed that slavery was a divine institution that should be accepted and defended rather than condemned.
They wrote about slavery from the standpoint of The Bible (Barnes opposed slavery, while Thornwell, a Southerner, supported it).
They used The Bible in maintaining that slavery was either immoral (Barnes) or acceptable (Thornwell).
They used The Bible in maintaining that slavery was either immoral (Barnes) or acceptable (Thornwell).
They wrote about slavery from the standpoint of the Bible (Barnes opposed slavery, while Thornwell, a Southerner, supported it).
They used The Bible in maintaining that slavery was either immoral (Barnes) or acceptable (Thornwell).
James Henry Thornwell
slavery
slavery
slavery
Albert Barnes used theological arguments based on interpretations of biblical passages to support the institution of slavery, while James Henley Thornwell also utilized biblical reasoning but focused on the idea that slavery was a necessary social institution ordained by God. Both men believed that slavery was justified from a perspective of divine approval.
different views on slavery APEX
James Henley Thornwell