no
Roman and Hebrew, probably among others.
The main advantage of the Hindu-Arabic numeral system is that it contains a 0 figure hence making mathematical operations a lot simpler than the Roman numeral system which doesn'tcontain a 0 symbol
The Romans had no numeral for zero. But later, during the middle ages, monks who still wrote in Latin and used Roman numerals introduced the symbol N (representing the Latin word Nullae) for zero.
A 0 symbol is not needed to carry out calculations in the Roman numeral system. Whereas in the Hindu-Arabic numeral system a 0 symbol is essential to carry out calculations. The Romans would have used an abacus counting device to make any intricate calculations.
The representation of 0 in Roman numerals is not applicable as the Romans did not have a symbol for zero in their numerical system.
No only the 0 does not have to be needed in Roman calculations. It cannot possibly be used. The Romans did not have 0.
The Hindu-Arabic system is what we use today which are: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 and 9 The Roman system is what we used in the past which were: I V X L C D and M
A number. 0- infinity.
It varies depending on the base you are using. The standard is the decimal system (because of the 10 fingers on our hands) 0-9. Some other used systems (especially for computers) are binary 2, octal 8, hexadecimal 16 using the digits: 0-9,A-F.
The roman numerals don't have a way to write 0, negative numbers, or fractions.
there is no roman numeral for itAnother answer: The Romans had no numeral to represent zero because there was no need for a zero in their system. We have 9 numbers plus the zero symbol. We add a zero on to the end of a number to convert it to tens and two zeros to convert it to hundreds and so on. The Romans simply had different symbols for tens and hundreds. For example we would write 1, 10, 20, 40, 50, 100 and 200 but the same numbers as Roman numerals would be I, X, XX, XL, L, C and CC, done quite simply with no need for a zero. In the middle ages monks, who still used Roman numerals and wrote in Latin, began to used the symbol N to represent zero (from the Latin Nullae meaning nothing).
The Roman numeral system is decimal but not directly positional and does not include a zero.