Yes.
131?
it means exactly that... NUMBERPATTERN:)
111, 121, 131, 222, 212, 232, 333, 313, 323
There is no palindrome for 14.
No, not necessarily. 121 is a palindrome number with 3 digits (odd) and is divisible by 11. So this satisfies the premise, but 101, 111, 131, etc are not divisible by 11.An example which satisfies the premise does not prove it true, but one which contradicts the premise is enough to prove it false.
Ere is a preposition that is a palindrome.
No, it isn't a palindrome.
The palindrome is Level.
The sum of two palindromic numbers is not necessarily a palindromic number. For example, adding the palindromic numbers 121 and 131 gives 252, which is also a palindrome. However, adding 121 and 122 results in 243, which is not a palindrome. Therefore, while some sums of palindromic numbers can be palindromic, it is not a guaranteed outcome.
Any number that is is a palindrome will always be a palindrome.
No. A palindrome reads the same backwards and forwards. 5791111975 is an example of a palindrome.
The palindrome is Gig.