16 is not a deficent number because it is a abundant number
Yes.
No 16 is deficient.12 and 18 are abundant.
32+16+8+4+2+1=63. 64 is deficient.
The proper divisors of 32 are 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16. They add up to 31, so 32 is deficient.
no. its a type of number. as in, a number can be deficient.
55 is deficient.
Deficient The factors of 16 (excluding itself) are: 1, 2, 8 1+2+8=11 This is less than 16, therefore deficient.
NO- 24 is not deficient.
Deficient. The sum of its proper factors is 1+2+4+8+16+32+64+128+256+512 = 1023. Since that sum is less than 1024, it is deficient.
A deficient number is a number with its proper factors equalling a lower number than itself.
It's deficient
A deficient number is one for which the sum of its factors, with the exception of itself, is less than the number itself. Or alternatively, any number for which the sum of its factors including itself is two times the number in question. As 23 is a prime number, its only factor other than itself is 1. Another example of a deficient number close to 23 is 26 - its factors, other than itself, are 1, 2, and 13, which, added together, equals 16. The opposite of a deficient number is an abundant number.