1600 was a leap year. 1700 and 1800 were not because they were not divisible by 400. If a year is divisible by 100, but not by 400, then it is not a leap year. That is the rules of a leap year. So 1600 was, but 1700, 1800 and 1900 were not; 2000 was and 2100 will not be.
1800 was not a leap year - therefore, February 1800 contained 365 days.
Generally, every fourth year is a leap year. However, "century" years like 1800 and 1900 are not leap years unless they are divisible by 400. So 2000 _was_ a leap year.
All years divisible by 4 are leap years. Exceptions occur at the end of century: if the year is divisible by 100, it is not a leap year, unless it is also divisible by 400. Thus, 1700, 1800, 1900 were not leap years, but 1600 and 2000 were leap years.All years divisible by 4 are leap years. Exceptions occur at the end of century: if the year is divisible by 100, it is not a leap year, unless it is also divisible by 400. Thus, 1700, 1800, 1900 were not leap years, but 1600 and 2000 were leap years.All years divisible by 4 are leap years. Exceptions occur at the end of century: if the year is divisible by 100, it is not a leap year, unless it is also divisible by 400. Thus, 1700, 1800, 1900 were not leap years, but 1600 and 2000 were leap years.All years divisible by 4 are leap years. Exceptions occur at the end of century: if the year is divisible by 100, it is not a leap year, unless it is also divisible by 400. Thus, 1700, 1800, 1900 were not leap years, but 1600 and 2000 were leap years.
Yes, if the year is divisible by 4 then it is a leap year with this exception:A century year (year ending in 00) is only a leap year if it is divisible by 400So the years 1800, 1900, 3000 are not leap years, for example, but the year 1600, 2000 were leap years and the year 2400 will also be a leap year, if we are still using the same calendar then.
1700, 1800, 1900, 2100, 2200, 2300.
Yes, 1804 was a leap year. Any year whose number is evenly divisible by four is a leap year, with two exceptions. Any year whose number is evenly divisible by 100 is NOT a leap year. Any year evenly divisible by 400 IS a leap year. So, 1800 was not a leap year, while 1804 WAS a leap year. 1900 was not a leap year, while 2000 (being divisible by 400) was a leap year.
Yes, except 1800 and 1900.
This is quite complex.Generally, if the number divides by 4 it's a leap year, so 2008 was a leap year.But, if it divides by 100 it's not, so 1700, 1800, 1900 were not leap years.But, if it divides by 400 it is, so 2000 was a leap year and 2400, 2800 will be.See the Related Link.
To find out if any year is a leap year there are two factors you have to take into account.Firstly the last two digits of the date are divisible by 4.1976 was a leap year (76/4=19)1978 was not a leap year (78/4=19.5)1980 was a leap year1984 was a leap year1994 was not leap year2010 is not leap year2012 will be a leap yearSecondly you have to take into account century years.If the last two digits are 00 then you see if the 1st 2 digits are divisible by 4.1600 was a leap year (16/4=4)1800 was not a leap year (18/4=4.5)2000 was a leap year2100 will not be a leap year2200 will not be a leap year2400 will be a leap year.
If the question is "How many days are in a year?" the answer is 365 but if it is a leap year there are 366. Answer:Considering the leap years there are 365.25 days in year. This does not account for the minor correction of haing no leap year in centrury (1800, 1900, 2000) years which are divisible by 400 as well as 4.
All the multiples of 4 are leap years, except for 1800 and 1900 (2000 is a leap year). I'll leave the counting to you.