Yes, it is.
Cubic litres can be much smaller than litres and litres aldready might be much smaller than the cubic metres and that is why we never say cubic litres for an object
Yes - 3 feet is equal to 0.9144 metres. The difference between this and one metre is 0.0856 metres.
A cube 6 ft X 6ft X 6 ft = 216 cubic feet, so 214 cubic feet is just a little smaller than that.
62 cubic feet is a measure of volume equal to about 463.79 US gallons.
No way. You don't even have to calculate this one.The individual cubies are smaller than a cubic foot.So 350 of them must have less than 500 cubic feet of volume.
16 cubic feet is three cubic feet larger than 13 cubic feet.
of course 3.75 cubic feet
Normal feet measure distance, cubic feet measure volume. Square feet measure area. This is not a difference in size, it is a difference in dimension. Distance is one dimensional, volume is three dimensional.
The difference between 9 cubic feet and 1.2 cubic feet is 7.8 cubic feet. This means that 9 cubic feet is 7.8 cubic feet more than 1.2 cubic feet.
No, cubic millimeters are considerably smaller than cubic inches.
Metres are bigger than feet. There are 0.3048 metres in one foot.
Cubic meters are larger than cubic feet. Specifically, one cubic meter is equivalent to approximately 35.3147 cubic feet. This means that if you have a volume measured in cubic meters, it will be significantly greater than the same measurement in cubic feet.