No, the lower the number the better.
go faster go faster
Cerebral age, or brain age, is a theory developed by Dr. Kawashima (a Japanese neuroscientist), who claims that the brain stops developing at the age of 20. So when playing puzzle games that can give you the age of your brain at the end of each round, the closer the brain age is to 20, the better your brain is.
because it is easier to learn and you brain is developing so it takes not as long, and your brain is fresh so whatever you try to learn at young age it stays there because at young age your brain is empty.
The bronze age was better than the steel age because they had better weapons better sheilds and better warriors like the Spartans
no its not gta is way better than age of empires
a 10-year-old with a mental age of 10, therefore, has an IQ score of 100. However, if the mental score is lower than the age, it drags the IQ score down. So, if the 10-year-old's mental age is 8, their score would only be 80
The average credit score is charted showing the relationship between age and the average credit scores. Younger people have lower credit scores than older people.
Your age depends on it, and its simply your opinion. Both games are better to different age groups. It depends on your age.
A happy medium is nice but this also depends on opinion. I personally believe that brain is better than beauty. Intelligence is a much more valuable quality to survive than beauty is. I do believe that hygeine and keeping a neat and respectable appearance is key to success as well.
During the age of enlightenment people believed that what was a better guide than faith or tradition
There's more shrinkage of her brain in the front and sides than in other women her age.
From what I remember learning at school... IQ follows the natural curve. That means given the average score and the standard deviation we can begin to define what a good score is. The average for IQ tests, by design is 100. So, right off the bat we see that every score is above average, and therefore they are all good scores, relative to the mean. It doesn't matter what age you are, your score can be compared to anyone's. We also know the standard deviation for IQ scores is 15, so we can begin to quantify how good the scores are if we know how standard deviation works. We know that 50% of the people will score below 100. If we move one standard deviation better than the mean we get 115. That's better than 84% of people. 90% of people will score under 130 (two standard deviations better than average). 99.4% of people will score under 145 (three standard deviations). 99.99% score under 160 (four s.d) 99.99997% score under 175 (five s.d.) (about 1 in 3 million score higher) 99.9999999% score under 190 (six s.d) (about 1 in 1 billion score higher) Finally, 99.9999999999% score under 205 (seven s.d.) (about 1 in 1 trillion score higher (an impossible score)). I know the percentages because that is just how standard deviations work. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_deviation Your question is inappropriate as all IQ tests are "normed". Any score will be relative to other children or adults of the same age. These tests are intentionally tested on children of different ages to discover what a "normal" child of a given age will score. The IQ score is how the individual did in relation to that normalized score. Anything over 100 is better than that age normed score and anything below 100 is below that normalized score.