it is a primary source, even a translation of it is a primary source, but that would not mean that any introduction or anything else written afterwards is a primary source.
But you have to be specific of what it is a primary source of, you cannot use it as a source of anything not directly experienced by the author, you can use it to describe things believed at the time, but this does not mean that they actually happened.
It is a primary source.
diary farmer primary or secondary
Primary- it comes from someone who was a witness to a historical event (In this case, the Holocaust).
Primary
Primary- it comes from someone who was a witness to a historical event (In this case, the Holocaust).
Primary would be the first of whatever you're talking about, and secondary would be the second or the once-removed whatever it is. For example, a primary source of research would be something like a diary or letter, which would be a first-line information source - a secondary source would be a textbook reporting about what the person described in the letter or diary.
It was a primary source
Jacqueline Van Maarsen and her diary which she named Kitty
We know so much about Anne Frank and her family because of her diary....it was a primary source.
A primary source is like a diary of somebody that has experienced something or the person them self (autobiography) A secondary source is when somebody has heard the story and retells it or writes about it. (biography) A primary source is the most reliable because information can be lost or changed by a secondary source so historians favor primary sources.
A personal diary is considered a primary source because it provides firsthand accounts of personal experiences and perspectives. Textbooks and biographies are considered secondary sources as they interpret and analyze information from primary sources.
The diary of a young girl, but better known title is Anne Frank diary.