The Athenian democratic system is still admired because it was a unique form of government. Athens used a direct democracy and instead of voting for officials to vote for the people, the Athenian people voted on bills and legislation themselves.
Athens became a genuine democracy - the citizens in assembly made the decisions and the council carried them out. Compared to this, today's representative democracies elect politicians, who do what they want, rather than what the electors want.
It was the model of a democracy for its citizens but not for others. It was not a model for freedom as it allowed slavery and the buying and selling of slaves for any purpose.
In name, Athens. However, it was a different model of democracy than that which exists today.
No, Greece is the first model for modern democracy. More specifically the city of Athens. They were the first ones to allow voting and many parts of today's law system.
As democratic as we cannot imagine today since all eligible citizens participated in the process on a daily basis in order to take the appropriate decisions with their vote - direct democracy and not a representative model as introduced 250 years ago.
Well-liked, accepted, admired, role-model. Well-liked, accepted, admired, role-model.
A representative democracy is the type of government that was most heavily influenced by the Athenian system. The difference being that only free Athenian men were represented. At the time, the other city-states were unlikely to follow Athens' lead unless they were members of the Delian League headed by Athens. These city-states had been turned into an empire of Athens and were under pressure to follow the democratic way. Modern democracies differ from the Athenian direct democracy model, which was only practicable in a community where citizens could walk into the city for the fortnightly meetings. The large size of countries today preclude this, so a representative democracy model s used, where parliamentarians do the decision-making with little reference to the wishes of the electors, which is quite different from the citizens themselves making the decisions in Athens.
He brought democracy to Athenians. The democracy of Athens gave power to the people and the laws of Athens gives equal justice for all.
Athens was the first Greek city-state to develop a system of democracy. This political innovation allowed citizens to participate directly in decision-making processes, influencing laws and governance. The Athenian model of democracy, established in the 5th century BCE, laid the groundwork for modern democratic systems and emphasized civic involvement and public debate.
Democracy in Athens and the United States today both emphasize the principle of citizen participation in governance. In Athens, citizens could directly vote on laws and policies, while in the U.S., citizens elect representatives to make those decisions on their behalf. Both systems value civic engagement and the idea of political equality among citizens, although the Athenian model was limited to free male citizens, whereas the U.S. democracy aims for broader inclusivity across gender, race, and socioeconomic status. Additionally, both democracies face challenges such as political polarization and the influence of special interests.
Initially a limited democracy based on landowners, then it was extended to a radical democracy ruled by all adult males who were citizens, who met in assembly and directed government.
Athenian democracy developed in the Greek city-state of Athens, comprising the central city-state of Athens and the surrounding territory of Attica, around 500 BC. Athens was one of the very first known democracies (although anthropological research suggests that democratic forms were likely common in stateless societies long before the rise of Athens). Other Greek cities set up democracies, most but not all following an Athenian model, but none were as powerful or as stable (or as well-documented) as that of Athens. It remains a unique and intriguing experiment in direct democracy where the people do not elect representatives to vote on their behalf but vote on legislation and executive bills in their own right. Participation was by no means open, but the in-group of participants was constituted with no reference to economic class and they participated on a scale that was truly phenomenal. The public opinion of voters was remarkably influenced by the political satire performed by the comic poets at the theaters.