developing
no, Kuwait is a developed country. it is a wealthy country from its oil *different person* as a Kuwaiti I agree. But for some reason the UN still recognizes us as a developing country.
yes
17th of September, 1974 was the date Bangladesh officially joined the UN. Though it is important to remember, that the area Bangladesh now occupies was a member under India, since the UN's inception.
No the United States of America is not a Least Developed Country (LEDC). The United States is currently classified as a developed country by the United Nations and is considered to have a high Human Development Index (HDI). According to the UN LEDCs are countries with a low Human Development Index indicating that the country faces challenges in terms of poverty health and access to education. The UN has identified the following criteria for a country to be classified as an LEDC: A low Human Development Index Low income High economic vulnerability Low levels of human assetsThe United States does not meet any of these criteria and is thus classified as a developed country by the UN.
The Human Development Index is a list conducted by the UN annually ranking countries on development scores. The most developed nation as of 2011 is Norway.
Russia is classified as a high-income country by the World Bank. It has a mixed economy with significant natural resources, particularly in oil and natural gas. However, it also faces challenges such as income inequality, corruption, and economic sanctions.
Its not better always. If the country is developed economy, then depnding upon the sector of investments and the profitable difference in the currency value can be an advantage, but if the sector is limited in growth while same sector in an emerging economy is promising iterated growth then its better to invest in it. Keeping in view the economic and political instability of under developed countries its not advisable to invest in them. But if a sector is profitable then developing countries could yieal long term profits. If the investement is not profit oreinted but by organizations such as UNICEF, UN AND WHO then it deepnds on the REQUIREMNTS of the country.
No. There are few questions in International Law which are clear. This one comes close. The United Nations does not have the legal power or permission to compel any country to perform a domestic activity which that country does not wish to perform. If no country volunteers to give asylum to any refugee or a particular group of refugees, no country would be required to do so. Additionally, the UNHCR, which deals with refugees, prefers to try and settle refugees in (1) their country of origin, i.e. Burma, (2) their country of current residence, i.e. Bangladesh, and then (3) somewhere else. As a result, the UN agencies are not going to pursue foreign resettlement until settlement in Burma and Bangladesh are exhausted.
Un-developed land
and why should UN declare Pakistan as a terrorist country?
Un château, un manoir
A Un Ambasador represents the country at the United Nations, and acts as the nations spokesperson for the country and its interests.