No the Graphics on Call of Duty World at War are supposed to be better with increased audio and video effects. see related links
Modern Warfare 2 no doubt about it.....i acctully have both and the graphics of world at war just suck compared to modern warfare 2
Personal opinion. Cod4: Modern Warfare maps are better and the game is more colorful.
In my opinion, it is way better. Modern Warfare 2 has better graphics, better guns, and better missions. Don't forget about the awesome equipment you use. The story line's incredible.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare: Reflex
Modern Warfare 2 is a better game if you are going to play online.
Modern Warfare 2 all the way dude. But just wait for Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 coming November 2011
Modern Warfare is rated a little higher than World at War see related links for both games
I'd go more to Call of duty Modern Warfare 2 :) As for world at war it has a bit less graphics and game play as the other does. The game does not exist for Nintendo Wii. The Only Modern Warfare game for Nintendo Wii is Call of Duty Modern Warfare Reflex Edition. It is not a Call of Duty 4 Modern Warfare or a Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 game and was not even designed by Infinity Ward , but designed by Treyarch and released in November 2009.
Modern Warfare is a year older
i personally think cod4 because it is more modern you know modern guns but on cod5 it is the old guns and dpends what machine it;s on like wii xbox PC or ps3 or even ps2 but would say defenitly cod 4
call of duty world at war
Modern Warfare 3 IS World War 3.