They are. Charles Manson is in Corcoran and Scott Peterson sits on death row at San Quentin near San Francisco.
Of his three known children, two are still alive and one committied suicide, reason unknown.
If you are referring to Charles Manson, who was responsible for the murder of several people in the 1960s, yes he is still alive.
Alive
Charles Manson IS still alive. He is now around the age of 75, and is still in Concoran State prison in California, doing a life sentence.Charles Manson is still alive, still in prison, and awaiting his next parole hearing. He has been denied parole 11 times. His next parole hearing is scheduled for 2012.
For example, Lynette Alice "Squeaky" Fromme is 66 years today and she was paroled.
Charles M Manson Jr is dead. He killed himself in 1993. There are no VALID pictures that can be found of him on the internet.Michael Brunner, his son with Mary Brunner, is alive and well. You can see him here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f035w8eD2f0.
Yes, Charles Manson was sent to the Vacaville Medical Facility in California after being convicted. He died there in 2017. Some of his followers are still alive today, but it is not clear where all of them are living, as they have dispersed over the years. It is not necessarily the case that all of them are living in Solano County.
He was. Manson loved it. Charles Manson was named Man of the Year in the underground newspaper 'Tuesday's Child' in early 1970. It was reported in Rolling Stone magazine No61 on 25th June 1970 with a photo of the front cover which is where the misconception originated. I have an original copy of the magazine which names Manson as 'the most dangerous man alive' - I guess this only serves to feed the myth about them naming him man of the year
Yes, she is still alive.
Until recently they were all alive and still incarcerated in the California Women's Prison in Fontuna, CA. Susan Atkins just recently passed away due to cancer.
Oscar Peterson died on December 23, 2007.
In real life there are very few true coincidences. For the circumstantial evidence in the Peterson case to be random and/or pure chance is ridiculous. The odds are astromnomical in fact. Peterson is exactly where he deserves to be. In a criminal case, circumstantial evidence, especially when there is much of it, is just as damning as physical evidence. It is given great weight in the courtroom, as it should be. There is no mystery to the Peterson case. The only person that would have benefited from Lacy and Conner's deaths was Scott Peterson. He never wanted to be a father, and he never acted like a husband either. He was a ticking timebomb and Lacy's pregnancy was the catylist that detonated it.