No. Halo 1 gave birth to the HALO franchise and its awesome. Any idiot who tells you otherwise has no respect for the classics. yes halo 1 did but halo reach started halo 1
no, but halo 3 is still a good game, reach is better because of the guns and facilities.
I have played and beat them both on all difficulties, both are challenging, however Halo Combat Evolved Anniversary is more challenging so that makes H.C.E.A. better than H.R.
In my opinion no. I hated GoW, but that's just my opinion.
No, Halo Reach shows what happened before Halo 1. In fact, in one of the missions in halo reach, you can see Master chief
after Halo reach,there is no more In total, there is :Halo 1,Halo 2, Halo 3, Halo ODST, Halo wars and Halo reach
Halo is better. For many Reasons. 1. Halo has much better music 2. Halo has a cooler name 3. Halo is an actual video game 4. I am very good at halo 5. Halo has better graphics than the Fray 6. Halo has better sound than the Fray 7. Halo has better gameplay than the Fray 8. The Fray doesn't have any enemies and many many other reasons.
How many people can play on 1 Tv,when you have Halo reach?
Halo anniversary has better graphics, halo reach multiplayer, new maps, and different music. However, there is a way to turn the old graphics back on if you want
In my opinion, Halo 3, because the storyline is better (partially because it continuing the story from 1 and 2). Halo Reach's campaign is still good, but should've been a bit longer. Anyway, don't let me decide for you, make your own decision :)
play halo 1 halo 2 halo 3 odst halo reach then you will know
You can in HALO 1 if you use mods, but it has to be on the computer.
Yes.it's based during halo 1 so is halo wars.( but that wasn't really a halo game)