no he actually was his brother in-law.
Edward the Confessor and Harold Godwinsson were related by the fact that they were cousins. Harold did not win the competition to become king but being Edward's cousin it was one of his advantages to be king. William the illegitimate son won.
Answer There is some confusion of names in this question. At the start of the year 1066 the King of England was Edward I, known as Edward The Confessor because he was a deeply pious Christian. He was later made a Saint. Harold Godwinson was Edward's brother-in-law (Edward was married to Harold's sister) and was extremely powerful as The Earl of Wessex. When Edward died on 5th January 1066, Harold Godwinson was proclaimed King by the Witan - an early forerunner of the English Parliament. Duke William of Normandy was a distant cousin of King Edward and he claimed that Edward had named him to be his successor - a claim also made by Harold Godwinson. Both claims may be true - it is possible that Edward had made the same promise to both men. In October 1066, Duke William invaded England and at the Battle of Hastings defeated King Harold and became King William I of England. Because he won the throne by means of invasion and battle, he is also known as William the Conqueror.
Harold Edward Winch died in 1993.
Harold Edward Winch was born in 1907.
Edward Harold Begbie died in 1929.
Edward Harold Begbie was born in 1871.
Harold Godwinson was married to Edward's the confesser sister.:)
Harold John Edward Peake was born in 1867.
Harold Edward Elliott was born on 1878-06-19.
Harold Edward Elliott died on 1931-03-23.
Harold John Edward Peake died in 1946.
He was blood-related to Edward (cousins) and varius people say Edward and Harold Godwinson promised him that he could be King.:)