Yes. It is on the boundary between the Indian Plate, and the Eurasian Plate.
yes
Some websites say it was on a subduction zone, but Discovery Channel says it was a hot spot, so you can decide for yourself.
Krakatoa is located at a convergent boundary, where the Indo-Australian Plate is being subducted beneath the Eurasian Plate. This subduction zone can lead to intense volcanic activity due to the melting and rising of magma from the subducted plate.
It erupted because it couldn't hold any longer.
The Yellowstone caldera is associated with a hot spot, not a plate boundary.
Yellowstone is not associated with a plate boundary. It is associated with a hot spot.
Krakatoa is located on the boundary of two tectonic plates: the Eurasian Plate and the Indo-Australian Plate. This area is known as the Sunda Arc subduction zone, where the Indo-Australian Plate is subducting beneath the Eurasian Plate, leading to volcanic activity in the region.
Mount Tambora is associated with a convergent plate boundary.
No. Kilauea is not associated with any plate boundary. It is associates with a hot spot under the Pacific Plate.
Krakatoa was formed off of a convergent plate boundary which pushed the land up and made a volcano.
Yes, Krakatoa is located on a subduction zone. The island sits on the convergent boundary between the Eurasian Plate and the Indo-Australian Plate, where the Indo-Australian Plate is subducting beneath the Eurasian Plate. This subduction zone contributes to the volcanic activity in the region.
each plate boundary has a different boundaries. if you want the movement for a specific plate boundary, write the name of the plate boundary. :]