Maximilian Robespierre is viewed by historians in both lights, reflecting the complexities of his role in the French Revolution. Some consider him a hero for his commitment to revolutionary ideals and social justice, particularly through his efforts to abolish the death penalty and promote equality. Conversely, many label him a villain due to his leadership during the Reign of Terror, where he sanctioned mass executions of perceived enemies of the revolution. Ultimately, interpretations of Robespierre vary widely, influenced by differing perspectives on the values of the revolution and the moral implications of his actions.
Yes, yes he is considered a villain
No, the cat is not considered to be a villain. It is a trickster character.
NO
He is considered the 2nd most evil person of all time
At the time Joan lived, the British were in control of France. She was considered a heroine by most of the French people but the British and British sympathizers considered her a villain and heretic because she was fighting to drive the British out of France.
She's Generally not seen as a villain, she's generally seen as the greatest monarch of English History and a British hero.
The Joker is generally considered to be Batman's greatest foe.
I don't think any of them could be considered "nice."
yes technically
well, one of them is Benedict Arnold. He betrayed the Americans.
i dont know ask somebody who really cares because thats not me
She's in between, as my friend says. She's deciding. As you might know, she's a villain when Batman is involved. But, she's also a hero as seen in the movie 'Cat Woman'. So just put this:Both hero and villain - Undecided.^^Did that help? If so, you're welcome!