Which is healthier McDonald's or chickfila?

Answer 1

No, not at all. Subway is healthier than McDonald's. For one thing, Subway does not use oil for the most part; whereas many of McDonald's foods are fried. Also, Subway does not sell a lot of beef; cows today are raised on "factory" farms where they may never get out of the barn and are in a small, confined space, are fed grains that very likely contain GMOs, and may be given synthetic hormones that are classified as drugs. Also, Subway offers a variety of vegetables, which are always better for health than a hamburger and fries.

Answer 2

No. Subway is far healthier than McDonald's. McDonald's patties have many preservatives that can cause cancer, not to mention the grease and calories. Subway's food compared to McDonald's is healthier by default because they use clean ingredients, fresh dough made there, fresh veggies, and pure meat with no preservatives. Their food isn't fried it's baked which is also another healthy factor.

Answer 3

Of course it is Subway, they have fresh salad, that they prepare everyday. Mcdonalds is a fat food takeway that don't have a great selection of vegetables.

Answer 4

Subway has the potential to be healthier than McDonald's. If a person orders a vegetarian sub with no dressings it is considered healthier than McDonald's burgers for example.

Answer 5

i would have to say Chick fa la on this one because you never hear Chick fa la being sued by fat people(no offense).

Answer 6

Chick- Fil-A they fry their foods in peanut oil which is alot healthier

Answer 7

Yes McDonalds is just a lot of processed foods, and the workers use their oils without changing them often. While subway has fresh ingredients right before your eyes