yes
The absolute magnitude of Rigel is -7.92 while that of Aldebaran is -6.41. This means that Rigel is approx 4 times brighter than Aldebaran - technically. So the question is based on a flawed grasp of absolute magnitude.
your mom is hotter than all the stars combined!
Rigel: 71 solar radiiAldebaran: 44.2 solar radii.So Rigel is almost twice the size of Aldebaran.See related link for a pictorial of the difference (Section 5).
Rigel is hotter than Aldebaran. Rigel, a blue supergiant, has a surface temperature of about 11,000 K, while Aldebaran, a red giant, has a surface temperature of around 4,000 K. The difference in their temperatures is due to their spectral classifications, with blue stars being significantly hotter than red stars. Thus, Rigel is the hotter of the two.
no you are stupid if you are answering this
Rigel is brighter than Betelgeuse. Rigel is a blue supergiant star and one of the brightest stars in the night sky, while Betelgeuse is a red supergiant and although it is one of the largest stars known, it is not as bright as Rigel.
Rigel is brighter than Betelgeuse. Rigel is a blue supergiant star that is one of the brightest stars in the night sky, while Betelgeuse is a red supergiant star that is dimmer in comparison.
The sun appears brighter than Rigel does because it is much closer to us by a factor of about 50 million.
Rigel, has a surface temperature of 12100 K, approx 3.1 times as hot as Aldebaran (3910 K).
This could be considered a trick question. Generally, Betelgeuse is brighter BUT Betelgeuse is what we call a variable star and there are times when it is fainter than Aldebaran.
Rigel is approximately 120,000 times brighter than the Sun. This high luminosity is due to Rigel's much larger size and higher temperature compared to the Sun.
Betelgeuse is brighter.