The Bible is a compilation of religious books, rather than a scientific study. Some people see inherent conflicts between the Bible and modern scientific knowledge and say that religious beliefs must adapt to modern knowledge about the world. Others say that the apparent conflicts between the Bible and modern scientific knowledge are not important because the Bible is only meant to be read allegorically.
For information about science and the Bible, please visit:
http://christianity.answers.com/theology/when-science-challenges-the-bible
all about technology is Science but the things the Bible mentions are not Science. Science is different to a Bible. Science is made by a person but the Bible is only wrote by a man but God made it.
The Bible is God; the Koran is Muhammed; and Science is mankind.
John Leabo has written: 'The harmonizing of science and the Bible' -- subject(s): Bible, Bible and science, Prophecies
John W. Doorly has written: 'Talks given by John W. Doorly on the science of the Bible' -- subject(s): Bible, Christian Science, Criticism, interpretation 'Christian Science: the revelation of Christ' -- subject(s): Christian Science 'Talks on the science of the Bible' -- subject(s): Christian Science 'The pure science of Christian Science' -- subject(s): Bible, Christian Science, Criticism, interpretation
Science of the Bible - 2005 The Crucifixion was released on: USA: 2005
Science of the Bible - 2005 Mysteries of the Bible The Hunt for the Lost Ark was released on: USA: 2006
William Nelson Pendleton has written: 'Science a witness for the Bible' -- subject(s): Religion and science, Bible and science
William Henry Shepfer has written: 'The Bible and science' -- subject(s): Apologetics, Bible and science, Religion and science
0 times because The Bible does not listen to 1 word of science
0 times because the bible does not listen to 1 word of science
== == No. It is based on religious belief and history, not science.
Science of the Bible - 2005 Birth of Jesus was released on: USA:2005