false
false
Fiber optic communication is less susceptible to electrical interference compared to copper wire communication. Fiber optic cables transmit data through light signals on glass fibers, so they are not affected by electromagnetic interference.
Using an Ethernet cable can provide a more stable and faster internet connection compared to WiFi, especially for activities that require high bandwidth, like gaming or streaming. Ethernet connections are less susceptible to interference and signal degradation caused by distance or obstacles. Additionally, wired connections typically offer lower latency, which can enhance the overall performance for real-time applications.
Fiber optics are less susceptible to interference compared to traditional copper cables because they transmit data using light signals instead of electrical signals. However, fiber optics can still be affected by external factors like bending, cutting, or contamination of the fiber optic cables.
The spread spectrum technique is supposed to be less susceptible to natural noise, co-channel RF interference, intentional jamming, and unauthorized eavesdropping. It should also be less susceptible to degradation due to multipath fading, which is highly frequency-selective.
Yes, some wireless standards, particularly those operating in the 2.4 GHz frequency band (like Wi-Fi and certain alarm systems), can be more susceptible to interference from other devices such as cordless phones and microwaves. This interference can lead to reduced performance or connectivity issues. On the other hand, standards operating in the 5 GHz band are generally less prone to interference but may have a shorter range. It's important to consider the frequency and potential overlap when setting up wireless devices in your home.
Plants are less susceptible to ozone and sulfur dioxide. It is because they have a filtering mechanism.
Unfortunately there are so many things that can interfere with AM that there is probably little that you can do that will work except to tune to a different station with less interference. This is why FM was developed, it is much less sensitive to interference.
AM (amplitude modulation) is the most susceptible to noise among the three analog-to-analog conversion techniques. This is because noise primarily affects the amplitude of the signal, leading to interference and distortions in the received signal. In contrast, FM (frequency modulation) and PM (phase modulation) are less susceptible to noise as they encode information in frequency and phase variations, respectively, which can be more effectively separated from noise during reception.
Gold is an amazingly good conductor and is also less susceptible to changes in temperature or interference from magnetic sources. Its rarity and cost makes it impractical to use in anything but equipment requiring the finest signal integrity.
Both AM (amplitude modulation) and FM (frequency modulation) are methods to add information to a carrier wave. The main difference is how they encode this information: AM varies the signal's amplitude, while FM varies the signal's frequency. AM is more susceptible to interference but has a longer range, while FM is less prone to interference and offers better sound quality.
they are less susceptible to theft