There is no question that the quality of content on Wikipedia is poor, especially when compared to a publication like Britannica. Wikipedia is not exactly "bad" because it usually has reliable information on it, however most schools do not allow students to use Wikipedia in research because anyone is allowed to contribute to Wikipedia, and they could put false information on..
Compare the site to at least two other good sites, then see if Wikipedia has the same information and facts. If it does, the site's reliable. If Wikipedia disagrees with the information on that site, Wikipedia's lying, and the site is reliable.
Go to site: wikipedia Yamato
Well it probrobly depends on what you think is a bad site like if it crashes your computer you might think thats a bad site to go on.
Wikipedia isn't a bad sight.......it really does help you when others contribute their knowledge it to help you solve a problem.....some people might think that it's "bad" b/c the information might no be correct and sources are not citied.
Wikipedia is the creator of this site.
Wikipedia is the creator of the site.
Wikipedia created this site.
Wikipedia is ran on funds donated by regular users. There is a donate link in the left menu of every wikipedia site.
Impact of Low Quality InformationIf Wikipedia had low quality information, people would stop using the site and go to another site to get reliable information. The fact that so many people use Wikipedia is a testament to the reliability of the information the site provides.
its wikipedia wwRcaPHC
I don't know. i am a bad boy. :P just kidding!go to wikipedia.
NO. you choose your friends. It is free.If there are bad people on there they permanently get blcked.