no a lt general is higher
Lt Commander
The difference between a general and commander is more simple than you think, they are in two different ranks but the name commander can be used as a general too.
what is more powerful L.T commander or a commander ?
No, there is no rank of commander in the Army. In the Army commander is a title, not a rank. In the Navy, there is a rank of Commander, it is the equivalent of Lt Colonel or O-5.
of course Cody is a commander and rex is captain
At the point were you get 600,000 cR you will be a COMMANDER! This is the rank after Lt. Colonel Grade 3.
If it is not dictated by a higher headquarters, then I would say it is up to the Brigade Commander. The Rear Detachment Commander would have to be authorized with sufficient UCMJ authority. Maybe a Lt. Col or Major. If the Brigade Commander was also the local Garrison/Base Commander, then that may complicate the matter, unless the Brigade Commander has a standing Deputy Commander for Base Operations.
It is not a question of power, it is a question of rank. A Lt is a commissioned officer and is of higher rank than a Sgt. who is a non-commissioned officer.
the only difference between the LS and LT models is the trim level.The LT model has more options and is priced higher than the LS model.
A COMMANDER IS HIGHER THEN A CHIEF IN THE MILILTARY AND DEPENDS ON THE SITUATION
The ranks probably originated in the 18th Century as armies became larger. My guess is that the rank of major general was created first to outrank the general of a brigade, or brigadier general as it was later known, and lt. general was created to denote a general who next in line to become as a general as a lt. governor is next in line to be a governor, but I do not know for sure. Today, a major general usually commands a division, and a lt. general usually commands a corps, but a major in the army is still higher than a lt.
Commander of the 552 Training Squadron, 552 ACW