Whether this question is in reference to the Red-necked Wallaby or the Red Kangaroo, the answer is still "no". All members of the kangaroo family are marsupials, which give live birth. The only egg-laying mammals are the platypus and the echidna.
A kangaroo gives live birth to a underdeveloped baby. The baby crawls upwards and enters the kangaroo's pouch. Once the baby latches onto a nipple, the baby stays inside the pouch until big enough to leave, though will get back in if frightened or tired.
no they are not born in a egg! are u a moron?
A baby leopard was born with not an egg but with its body
batillog
no
When they egg
They are born alive, as seals are mammals.
The Robin is hatched from a baby blue egg.
An egg will be there and it will be cracked.
The fertilised egg attaches itself to the uterus (womb) and develops and grows till the baby is born
Everything inside your mothers womb, when you were not born, was merely as you could say "an egg". This "egg" is then fertilized by the man and when the "egg" is fertilized ......BOOM!!!! The baby is born.
The kangaroo rat is a placental mammal (and a different species from the marsupial known as the rat-kangaroo of Australia). Therefore, it gives birth to live young. The only egg-laying mammals are monotremes, which includes just the platypus and the two species of echidna.