Children in underwear can be classified as child nudity, even if the images are not sexually explicit in nature. However, possessing the more innocent pictures, such as in a family album, will not get you arrested.
Nakedness or nudity ! Bare skin in other words.
There is no overt nudity, but they get around earlier movie restrictions by posing the trio in their underwear as they have girl talk in their shared apartment. Its all gratuitous but fun.
Tiger underwear does
well its kind of inappropriate for kids because there in there bra and underwear that's inappropriate for kids and there putting super stars in bras and underwear its half nudity
They were explicit in their criticisms of the plan. Explicit nudity or sexual activity is normally classed as pornography.
No, you won't. You may get called a slut by peers, but no, you'll only get banned for nudity.
13+ for violence and child nudity, i believe.
Kureyon Shin-chan - 1992 Gratuitous Child Nudity 1-20 was released on: USA: 23 May 2007
Yes and no depending on the amount of jobs your child does per day.
They are classed as Child Adventure and fantasy
Child's Play was rated R for violence, language, and brief nudity,
In the UK, anyone under the age of 18 is classed as a child.