faster then the speed of light is possible in a wormhole
A square mile is bigger.
A kilometer is a measure of length, a squared kilometer is a square representing the area of a kilometer squared. Each side is a kilometer in length. You cant really compare the two, length and area are two different types of measurement's I suppose based on the simplicity of the question, that a square kilometer is larger.
A square mile is a square mile wherever it is. Except Italy would have kilometers, and a square kilometer is smaller than a square mile
There can be no comparison. A mile is a measure of distance in 1-dimensional space whereas a square acre would be a measure of hyper-volume in 4-dimensional space!
Square miles is bigger than miles square. Square miles refers to an area that is one mile by one mile, totaling one square mile. Miles square refers to an arrangement of miles in a square shape, which is not a standard unit of measurement.
Yes it is, example :- 1 square mile is 2.589988 square kilometers. 1 square kilometer is 0.3861022 square miles.
A kilometer is shorter than a mile. So a square mile is bigger than a square kilometer.
If you have a circular area with a 50-mile radius, the area of the circle is approximately 7,854 square miles (rounded).
None. They are all much bigger than that.
A kilometer is a measure of length, and a square mile is a measure of area, so you can't compare them. However, a mile is longer than a kilometer (comparing length to length), and a square mile is larger than a square kilometer (comparing area to area).
There is no particular shape for a sqpecified area: it could be circular, or polygonal or any random shape.
A mile is way bigger than a footMile = 5,280 ft