It may be possible to enforce the contract. If the party can show that they saw the individual as an agent of the other party, the courts will often enforce it.
Void contracts and unenforceable contracts are often used interchangeably. A void contract is not valid and therefore unenforceable. An unenforceable contract may be valid, but can not, for a number of reasons, be lawfully enforced.
Void contracts and unenforceable contracts are often used interchangeably. A void contract is not valid and therefore unenforceable. An unenforceable contract may be valid, but can not, for a number of reasons, be lawfully enforced.
Void contracts and unenforceable contracts are often used interchangeably. A void contract is not valid and therefore unenforceable. An unenforceable contract may be valid, but can not, for a number of reasons, be lawfully enforced.
Commodity future contracts are transferable (can be bought and sold), to realize a profit or loss, but the obligation in the contract remains valid.
No. Not if it can be determined that the signatory is unauthorized.
none at all because its all good.
The contract is always inforceable by law. And all the parties are legally perfoming there contracts.
They can be bought and sold but the obligation in the contract remains valid.
A void contract is not legally valid from the beginning, while a voidable contract is initially valid but can be canceled or voided by one of the parties involved.
They can be bought and sold but the obligation in the contract remains valid.
Yes it is. That's the advantage of fax, it can be use a legal document.
from wawa(ums kal) :contracts under seal are valid without a consideration or perbaps