No galaxies is way biger than a star, a star is .0000765% of a galaxy.
A subgiant star is bigger than a neutron star. Neutron stars are incredibly dense and compact, with a radius of about 10-15 kilometers, while subgiant stars have a larger radius of several million kilometers.
A white dwarf is much larger than a neutron star.
Because there way bigger than the star
No. While a neutron star has more mass than the sun, it is compressed into a very small area about the size of a city.
A typical neutron star has a diameter of about 24km our Sun has a diameter of 1.392×106 km So our Sun is about 58,000 times bigger than a neutron star.
Our Universe is bigger, than a galaxy.
Lmao, 220,000ly gaalxy vs. a dwarf star that has a diameter of 1.3mln km lmao it's obvious Andromeda is a bigger
no. the sun is a star and the milky way is a galaxy.
A subgiant star is larger than a neutron star. Neutron stars are incredibly dense and compact remnants of massive stars, while subgiant stars are in a transitional phase between main sequence and red giant stages, typically larger and more diffuse than neutron stars.
Smaller than a neutron
Yes, a neutron star is much more massive and denser than a planet. Neutron stars are formed from the remnants of massive stars and are typically only a few kilometers in diameter, while planets can be thousands of kilometers in size.
No. A neutron star is quite small, generally only a few miles across. A nebula is light years across.