only if that person is being charged with a crime.
The authorities can question anyone at any time. The individual does not have to answer. They are only entitled to counsel if they are being charged with a crime.
yes
Although there is no "legally defined" difference between the two words, and it is purely a matter of semantics, you could say that it occurs at the point at which the person being "interviewed" is advised of their "Miranda Rights." After that point it becomes an 'interrogation.' An interrogation, in criminal law, is the process of questions asked by police to a person arrested or suspected to seek answers to a crime. Such person is entitled to be informed of his rights, including right to have counsel present, and the consequences of his answers. If the police fail or neglect to give these warnings, the questions and answers are not admissible in evidence a the trial or hearing of the arrested person
What happens is you get a lawyer. You're entitled to one! Tell the lawyer everything you've expirienced and follow his counsel.
Jack Collins
use police from a near by town to conduct the lineup
Police officers can influence whom witnesses identify in a lineup - apex!
A show up is right away, when a witness or victim is taken to see the suspect, and a line up is multiple person with similar features behind the window.
Making changes to the traditional police lineup can reduce errors
The author presents viewpoints that support his or her opinion.
In most cities, the city council or the mayor appoint the chief of police.
The victim is the one identifying the assailant/guilty party from the line up-not in it.