It depends. There are certain situations where they could be. If they gave faulty instructions to their agent, of they were negligent in hiring the agent, or if they did not supervise the agent properly. Then, there is the doctrine of Respondeat Superior, which allows a principal to be liable for their agent's acts that happened while the agent was acting "in the scope" of the agent's authority. Then, there are specific factors that have to be met in order to prove that. It gets very complex.
If the principal is NOT the producer of the faulty products they cannot be liable, regardless of WHO sells them.
Yes. The rule says that the principal is liable for the torts committed by the agent; subcontractor in this case.
substandard products means those products which will not have the similar quality or characteristics of the original product. It is also coming out of the similar manufacturing processes by which good quality products are made. It is goods under the CETA and liable to pay excise.
guarantor
true
"They try to avoid being liable for damages inccured for their products, often that is why companies have LLC or Limited Liability Company on the end of their name/title"
Under normal circumstances, no. An attorney-in-fact only acts on behalf of the principal and signs for the principal as the principal would act on their own and sign legal documents on their own. The attorney-in-fact has no personal responsibility for the debts of the principal.
An agent who acts contrary to the duties of an agent can be liable to the Principal or the Principal's successors in interest for the amount required to restore the value of the Principal's property to what it would have been had the violation not occurred.
Agency : principle is liable for the act of agent and agent get fees or commission from the principle. Franchise : Principle is not liable for the act of agent and PRINCIPAL get fees of commission form the agent.
the agent is under the authority of the principal, or insurance carrier, and has the ability to make decisions as a representative of the carrier. Therefore, the principal can be held legally liable for the agent's business
The party that is liable for a surety bond claim depends on the specific terms and conditions of the bond. Generally, the principal, who is the party that purchased the surety bond, is initially liable for any claims made against the bond. However, if the principal fails to fulfill their obligations, the surety company may step in and become liable for the claim.
The Power of Attorney is not personally responsible. If they have mis-managed the funds, they could be held liable to the grantor of the responsibility.
the shareholders